If you want to frame it that way then fine by me: "there are no limits to free speech, but there are limits to what can be described as free speech". I'd argue

If you want to frame it that way then fine by me: "there are no limits to free speech, but there are limits to what can be described as free speech". I'd argue that it's effectively exactly the same problematic seen from a slightly different angle. Saying things like "I support Nazis" could be considered a valid political opinion protected by free speech in some countries and illegal hate speech in others.