3 ms·
Summary: people who maintain popular projects can sometimes be jerks because of all of the pressure; it is not an excuse to be a jerk when submitting tickets an
by jarin 15y ago
Summary: people who maintain popular projects can sometimes be jerks because of all of the pressure; it is not an excuse to be a jerk when submitting tickets and/or patches.
This is why I try to submit patches instead of tickets whenever possible. When I can't quite wrap my head around the fix when submitting a ticket, I ask if anyone can point me in the right direction so I can at least try to help fix it.
- ericb 15y agoWith few exceptions, I categorically deny the existence of any entitlement to be a jerk. By entitlement, I specifically mean justifications like "well, I was under a lot of pressure." There's always a "reason" one can give for being a jerk.
- sandal 15y agoYou're absolutely right. And to clarify, my article is not in any way meant to claim that the way that the RubyGems maintainers are acting is justified. Instead, I'm just trying to make the point that their experience with end users is not exactly full of ponies and rainbows, and if you act like a jerk to a maintainer, you should not expect civility in response. Users of RubyGems who proactively act rudely to the maintainers in the expectation that they will be treated rudely are only making things worse. I think in the very worst case, that the idea that RubyGems is under some sort of tyrannical rule would seem less incredulous if contributors and users would at least try being civil first. Those that don't are simply poking at a sore wound.