4 ms·
I don't think it's inconsistent to simultaneously believe: * In general, tech companies should be less powerful and monopolistic. * In this specific case, the
by munificent 6y ago
I don't think it's inconsistent to simultaneously believe:
* In general, tech companies should be less powerful and monopolistic.
* In this specific case, the tech companies used the power they have in a way that is overall beneficial to society.
Trump incited a violent insurrection on the US Capitol. If Senators and Representatives had not successfully escaped through tunnels before the rioters got to them, some of them would be dead. The fact that Trump is still in office after that shows that the US absolutely does not have a functioning legislative branch to check Trump's executive power.
In the absence of that, we need some entity powerful enough to push back against rising fascism and authoritarianism. I don't like that that power apparently has to be a handful of tech giant companies, but I'll take that (temporarily at least) over the US becoming a right-wing dictatorship.
- codekilla 6y agoThis seems fair. > the US absolutely does not have a functioning legislative branch I'm more concerned by this than anything else. In effect this results in calcified government, which can neither regulate tech companies (or anything) effectively, or serve as a check on executive power. People need to start moving to Wyoming and Alaska, yeah the weather sucks.....but we need to redefine 'civic duty'.