https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_United_States_presidential_election#Summary_of_post-election_lawsuits https://en.wikipe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_United_States_presidential_election#Summary_of_post-election_lawsuits https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related... The lack of standing was only a single component, Judges did see what "evidence" the suits had they found it uncompelling in addition to lack of standing. Below is the ruling from one of the Arizona cases: "The judge ruled that the plaintiffs lacked legal standing; their fraud allegations were vague and implausible, and their evidence was unreliable or irrelevant."