3 ms·
It doesn't seem to be THAT bad as LTS phases were introduced in the first place only very recently. See: https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/kqi1v8/qt_515_c
by est31 6y ago
It doesn't seem to be THAT bad as LTS phases were introduced in the first place only very recently. See: https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/kqi1v8/qt_515_commercialonly_lts_phase_starts_closing/gi4o0ua/ https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/kqi1v8/qt_515_commer...
Also, some distros haven't even updated to the latest FLOSS version of the LTS release, so it seems to not be that important to the maintainers.
- Rochus 6y agoRight. Never saw a benefit in switching to the most recent version. Still very satisfied with Qt 4.8 and 5.4. Apparently they closed the LTS branch for community contributions which is reasonable because otherwise the community would contribute to a version which would only be accessible to other community members a year later.
- jcelerier 6y ago> Right. Never saw a benefit in switching to the most recent version. Still very satisfied with Qt 4.8 and 5.4. if you have any users with a hidpi screen it makes a huge difference to them
- Rochus 6y agoI have indeed; macOS is no issue; Windows needs a couple of ifdefs, no big deal.
- jcelerier 6y agothere are plenty of hidpi bugs that were only fixed in 5.12 ... 5.15 though. Even 5.12 is still a big mess with e.g. 125% scaling on windows - text will scale but not images, things like that