4 ms·
c2.com is classic, or in other words: archaic, software. This makes the page hard to read in this case. For example, it seems to be written in the style of a di
by aristidb 15y ago
c2.com is classic, or in other words: archaic, software. This makes the page hard to read in this case. For example, it seems to be written in the style of a discussion, by multiple people, but you never know who wrote what (there are a few signed comments, but most are not). There are also no sub-headings to help you navigate the page.
It (Lisp's "lack of visual cues") is also an interesting topic, and I think it would be especially interesting if you looked at this while comparing it to Haskell.
- officemonkey 15y agoWard's Wiki was the first wiki, and as such, many of the pages were a mess. When you winnow through the crap, there's a lot of pure gold. I was active at Ward's Wiki from 1999 to 2002. I just spent some seriously nostalgic moments clicking around.
- sedachv 15y agohttp://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WikiIsNotWikipedia http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WikiIsNotWikipedia