4 ms·

Actually we were there several years ago -- do a search on the IBM T221 monitor. I think they were about $15,000 or so, and they only made them for a couple o

Actually we were there several years ago -- do a search on the IBM T221 monitor. I think they were about $15,000 or so, and they only made them for a couple of years. I imagine it's pretty awkward to use one in Windows, since so many UI elements don't scale in any sensible way.

naner 15y ago
I found one on ebay: http://cgi.ebay.com/IBM-T221-WQUXGA-Display-not-NEC-PA241W-Apple-Cinema-LED-/290567969698 http://cgi.ebay.com/IBM-T221-WQUXGA-Display-not-NEC-PA241W-A... Currently $1,700 to buy it now. 203 dpi. You need Windows 7, Linux, or OSX. I don't believe Windows XP and earlier are capable of scaling properly.
mambodog 15y ago
Clearly resolution independent windowing & UI widgets are also a prerequisite, and as this would likely require most existing applications to be extensively modified I don't see either Apple or Microsoft rushing to get it done.
- adambyrtek 15y ago
  According to a Wikipedia article[1] Microsoft did a good job when it comes to resolution independence, and Apple also makes progress on that front. "Microsoft Windows has supported DPI aware programs since Windows Vista and allows user specified DPI settings for the windowing interface. [...] The Windows Presentation Foundation from Microsoft, and consequently, WPF applications, are also designed to be resolution-independent." "Apple has included some support for resolution independence in recent versions of Mac OS X, which can be demonstrated with the developer tools Quartz Debug, which includes a feature which allows the user to scale the interface." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resolution_independence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resolution_independence