3 ms·
That's because it's based on what scientists are researching. Scientists are working on objective maximizers. Maybe there are other possibilities, but people ar
by im3w1l 6y ago
That's because it's based on what scientists are researching. Scientists are working on objective maximizers. Maybe there are other possibilities, but people aren't working on them so they are not as relevant.
See what I'm saying? People are building paperclip optimizers in labs right now, and the only reason they aren't taking over the world just yet is because our attempts are so primitive.
- LargoLasskhyfv 6y agoYes, yes! But...that are human scientists. Why would anything from them apply to something which we can't even imagine? Isn't that what all this rambling is about? Something emerges, morphs(maybe unseen/unintended) into another Gestalt/shape/form which for all practical purposes is unconstrained. Most of you: We are sooo fucked! I: Are we really? How do you know?
- im3w1l 6y agoYou don't propose any mechanism for that to happen, so it seems like unwarranted antropomorphization.
- LargoLasskhyfv 6y agoYou mean like the ones who do the same, just in a negative way? Because we are so bad AGI must be too? Yeah. So be it.