So much discussion about a lawsuit that is nothing but a conspiracy theory formatted as a legal case. I encourage everyone to read the first few pages of filin

So much discussion about a lawsuit that is nothing but a conspiracy theory formatted as a legal case. I encourage everyone to read the first few pages of filing. Parler alleges 2 things: 1. Anti-trust: Amazon kicked off Parler because it colluded with Twitter because Parler is a competitor to Twitter hence they violated The Sherman Act. The reason this will fail is because Parler presented 0 evidence to support their allegations. Evidence is the thing that differentiates a wrongdoing that can be litigated from a crackpot conspiracy theory. This is a crackpot conspiracy theory and I can't wait to read the rebuttal from Amazon's lawyers. It's going to be a hoot. 2. Breach of contract: "it says we get 30 days notice and we didn't get 30 days". Apparently Parler conveniently left out other parts of the contract. One, the part that says you don't always get the 30 days. Two, the part that says contract disputes are resolved via arbitration, not litigation. So it's not going to fly either and is pointless to begin with. The only remedy Parler could ask for is money and I'm sure Amazon will happily refund them 3 months of fees if for some unimaginable reason the court finds they did indeed breach the contract.