4 ms·
Ah so it's only for the chat.. So they don't use Jitsi for voice by the sounds of it (which is what Matrix uses for voice). Makes sense but it would have been
by GekkePrutser 6y ago
Ah so it's only for the chat.. So they don't use Jitsi for voice by the sounds of it (which is what Matrix uses for voice).
Makes sense but it would have been nice to have been fully open source-based.
- sho_hn 6y ago> which is what Matrix uses for voice Matrix also has its own voice/video, but it's not considered entirely ready for prime time yet, hence the Jitsi embeds.
- Arathorn 6y agoMatrix uses its own voice/video for 1:1, which is very nearly ready for prime time (we've been iterating a lot on it over the last few months, and are about to declare it open for business). We embed Jitsi for voice/video conferences, but we're experimenting more and more with native Matrix conferencing over the course of this year.
- GekkePrutser 6y agoAha I wasn't aware of that, thanks for enlightening me! I didn't know there was built-in conferencing at all. This is great!
- gsich 6y agoThank god.
- StavrosK 6y agoThat would have removed a large piece of the competitive edge for them. You don't swap out your core advantage.