> Absolutely agree with his gripes in the first article about the traditional historically-oriented introduction to QM confusing students. Off-topic but that's

> Absolutely agree with his gripes in the first article about the traditional historically-oriented introduction to QM confusing students. Off-topic but that's also my problem with any introduction to philosophy I've seen. This old Greek said something. This other old Greek thought something else. Some German philosopher said still something else. Maybe that's what philosophy is all about, in which case I'm perfectly happy not to learn anything about it. But I have the feeling there really is something interesting to be found, if only the books would talk about that instead of painstakingly reconstructing the whole history of the field.