4 ms·
Sorry, that's misinformation (pulled right from your search). Nothing there points to Paul being racist https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.theatlantic.co
by ulucs 6y ago
Sorry, that's misinformation (pulled right from your search). Nothing there points to Paul being racist
https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/12/the-story-behind-ron-pauls-racist-newsletters/250338/ https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.theatlantic.com/pol...
https://www.fox19.com/story/16449477/reality-check-the-story-behind-the-ron-paul-newsletters/ https://www.fox19.com/story/16449477/reality-check-the-story...
- pvg 6y agoI think 'cherrypicked out of your search' is more accurate. For instance, here's the first author you selected "Michael Brendan Dougherty is a senior writer at National Review [...]" Wikipedia is maybe a more reasonable averaging of all sources. And it's mostly a long history of bigoted stuff that Ron Paul was not responsible for but somehow kept showing up in a newsletter with his name on it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul_newsletters https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul_newsletters
- ulucs 6y agoI don't get your point, even Wikipedia claims that he didn't write them.
- tptacek 6y agoWell, if 51% of Wikipedians believe it's true, it must be so.
- drak0n1c 6y agoWikipedia is also very biased on political matters, according to its co-founder Larry Sanger. https://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wikipedia-is-badly-biased/ https://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wikipedia-is-badly-biased/