2 ms·
Good point... maybe first transforming the data to be approximately normal could be a solution? (I'm not a statistician)
by isoprophlex 6y ago
Good point... maybe first transforming the data to be approximately normal could be a solution? (I'm not a statistician)
- gregw2 6y agoMy current take on this is that one should use a P99 (or P99.9, etc) median and anything above that is considered an anomaly. You then are not assuming anything about the distribution. I'm curious if others think this is a bad/good approach.