7 ms·

Get ready for a wild ride. The actions of this week are going to have cascading, emboldening effect across tech. The article shared earlier this week [1] that r

Get ready for a wild ride. The actions of this week are going to have cascading, emboldening effect across tech. The article shared earlier this week [1] that received attention here gives me pause and genuine concern that these actions by these companies results in greater conflict. [1] https://www.livescience.com/22109-cycles-violence-2020.html https://www.livescience.com/22109-cycles-violence-2020.html

kristofferR 6y ago
I don't find that article/research convincing at all. Correlation, not causation etc. There are much better arguments for why current events/actions may cause unintentional side effects and blowback than "it happens every 50 years".
- andrew_ 6y ago
  You may (or may not) find the original discussion interesting, in which some users delve further into the details https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25712080 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25712080
trianglem 6y ago
4chan needs to go sooner rather than later
- yurielt 6y ago
  why should the last bastion of actual free speech be gone? Specially since there isnt but one particular board that is the cause of most of the conmotion. If you hate the liberty of those that disagree with you just say it instead of hiding behind vague threats about place you dont know anything about.
  - dmead 6y ago
    i'm sorry, are you suggesting that we don't have free speech without 4chan?
    - salawat 6y ago
      Your free speech is not what others call free speech, hate to tell ya.
      - yurielt 6y ago
        A narrow definition of free speech and freedom of speech, is self defeating. Eh hate to tell ya.
    - nine_k 6y ago
      Try saying something heavily against the current discourse, worse yet, in a way that the current discourse sees as unacceptable. For clarity, avoid any calls to violence. How many places would not deplatform you, suspend you, or at least downvote you into oblivion? Not many. Anonymous boards are some of such places. Even if you think that some people are patently wrong on the Internet, dangerously and irredeemably wrong, it's more useful to be aware that such people exist, than to hide this fact from yourself in order to have a quieter sleep. Freedom is, by definition, also freedom for those you disagree with, despise, even hate. If either side forces their (doubtlessly, virtuous and well-founded) views on the other (doubtlessly, misinformed and stubborn), I have a hard time calling it freedom. It's a standard ideological oppression.
      - sofixa 6y ago
        Check out the paradox of tolerance and Goebbels's thoughts on the matter: https://alphahistory.com/nazigermany/goebbels-on-the-reichstag/ https://alphahistory.com/nazigermany/goebbels-on-the-reichst...
        nine_k 6y ago
        This is a good quotation. One thing is just speaking, another, speaking and voting in a parliament. OTOH I like the idea that every new Parliament member should bring an idea which is currently illegal, and work on integrating it into the legal framework. Thus is how all change (to the bad and to the good the same) occurs in a peaceful way. It's interesting to note how many now-mainstream ideas were fringe 30 years ago, and outright scandalous 100-150 years ago: universal suffrage, social security, gay marriage, legal marijuana, etc.
  - sli 6y ago
    I am happy to say that I do and would not give a single, solitary shit about a hive of racists and hatemongers losing their platform for spreading those things. Liberty is irrelevant to this, nobody is owed a platform owned by somebody else, not even 4chan, and until 4chan/8chan/8kun and the like are running their own datacenters, their platform is not fully theirs.
    - Hamuko 6y ago
      Where is 4chan hosted then?
    - yurielt 6y ago
      I commend you to visit the place and you will discover that you are mistaken. There is one ONE place where there is racism and is literally called a containment board is /pol/. Outside of that honestly it seems you have a personal problem with people that you dont know like I doubt the people of /origami/ are "hatemongers" but what do I know. And while people arent "owed" a platform. Given the actual and the factual characteristics of modern web infrastructure, what you are saying is " Yes I would like to spread my buttchecks such that Mr Zuckerberg, Mr Bezzos and five more guys control what can and cant be said.". I dont want to give a shit about that people either but not caring about this is what is going to entrench the power of ZUckerberg and cronies, and I dont want silicon valley assholes in charge (even more)
  - trianglem 6y ago
    I’ve been on 4chan since before 2008, was the “mod” of a board and even met moot a few times irl. Fun and games for a very short time followed by immediately realizing how cancerous what was happening was. Using humor to poison minds, that place should burn in hell.
- devmunchies 6y ago
  hydra[1]. if you remove 4chan I guarantee you well get 3 in its place. [1]: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hydra-Greek-mythology https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hydra-Greek-mythology
  - edgineer 6y ago
    There are already many smaller chans, with varied attending demographics. I think this is referred to as "the webring." 4chan would sure be a shame to see go, though.
  - klodolph 6y ago
    Why do you say that? What do you mean by that? If you take an online community down, the people that made up that community will not all end up in the same place, they won’t bring the entire culture of that community with them, and some of them won’t make the jump. Maybe you end up with three new chans, but you end up with three smaller, more fractured chans. Organization and relationships will evaporate because people won’t have alternate ways of recognizing or reaching their friends, may not use the same handles, may not end up on the same sites, etc. Site administrators will get worn out and tired of dealing with it, and may run out of money to keep the site up. I’m not saying that you should take down 4chan, just saying that if 4chan did disappear, it would leave a big hole that would take a long time to fill again. That, and any new chans would have a hard time claiming to be THE chan. There are already like twenty active “chan” sites or more. Besides 2channel and 4chan, the other sites don’t have much credibility or “pull”.
    - devmunchies 6y ago
      I think 4chan is different. It has a unique user base with a lot of internet history. If you take it down it will create a new energy in the free speech movement that will gain incredible momentum. 4chan is definitely functioning as a containment site right now. It hasn't changed in years, so a replacement would likely be more innovative.
      - klodolph 6y ago
- KLexpat 6y ago
  4chan /g/ is basically an uncensored 2003 version of Hacker news. In fact, they often discuss the same topics. I saw the 'gnome DE' article posted there last week - after it was shared with HN it got 1k+ upvotes. The 'blue boards' are probably very similar to you in terms of worldview
  - trianglem 6y ago
    Yes, nothing wrong with the “censored” version of hacker news here. There is clearly a lot of good or 4chan but it’s not worth it.
- thinkingemote 6y ago
  4chan is protected by LEO. It proactively reports illegal postings to LEO, shares logs proactively, responds quickly and is heavily moderated. Additionally most of the site isn't troublesome. The rules are US freedom of speech which is much more liberal than Europe and hate speech definitions so the content on the adult boards is shocking to me and some may be illegal in Europe, but it's not illegal in the US. There are worse sites but this one is the one that enters the less well informed public's consciousness ironically.
  - trianglem 6y ago
    It’s definitely troublesome. Racist memes may not be illegal but they are hugely damaging to a multi ethnic society.
drak0n1c 6y ago
Ron Paul was locked out of his Facebook page today. https://twitter.com/ronpaul/status/1348694943905308672 https://twitter.com/ronpaul/status/1348694943905308672
- DisjointedHunt 6y ago
  This is absolutely ridiculous.
- Hamuko 6y ago
  I thought Ron Paul was just an old crank with a shitty son, and not some radical.

kristofferR 6y ago

I don't find that article/research convincing at all. Correlation, not causation etc. There are much better arguments for why current events/actions may cause unintentional side effects and blowback than "it happens every 50 years".

andrew_ 6y ago
You may (or may not) find the original discussion interesting, in which some users delve further into the details https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25712080 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25712080

trianglem 6y ago

4chan needs to go sooner rather than later

yurielt 6y ago
why should the last bastion of actual free speech be gone? Specially since there isnt but one particular board that is the cause of most of the conmotion. If you hate the liberty of those that disagree with you just say it instead of hiding behind vague threats about place you dont know anything about.
- dmead 6y ago
  i'm sorry, are you suggesting that we don't have free speech without 4chan?
  - salawat 6y ago
    Your free speech is not what others call free speech, hate to tell ya.
    - yurielt 6y ago
      A narrow definition of free speech and freedom of speech, is self defeating. Eh hate to tell ya.
  - nine_k 6y ago
    Try saying something heavily against the current discourse, worse yet, in a way that the current discourse sees as unacceptable. For clarity, avoid any calls to violence. How many places would not deplatform you, suspend you, or at least downvote you into oblivion? Not many. Anonymous boards are some of such places. Even if you think that some people are patently wrong on the Internet, dangerously and irredeemably wrong, it's more useful to be aware that such people exist, than to hide this fact from yourself in order to have a quieter sleep. Freedom is, by definition, also freedom for those you disagree with, despise, even hate. If either side forces their (doubtlessly, virtuous and well-founded) views on the other (doubtlessly, misinformed and stubborn), I have a hard time calling it freedom. It's a standard ideological oppression.
    - sofixa 6y ago
      Check out the paradox of tolerance and Goebbels's thoughts on the matter: https://alphahistory.com/nazigermany/goebbels-on-the-reichstag/ https://alphahistory.com/nazigermany/goebbels-on-the-reichst...
      - nine_k 6y ago
        This is a good quotation. One thing is just speaking, another, speaking and voting in a parliament. OTOH I like the idea that every new Parliament member should bring an idea which is currently illegal, and work on integrating it into the legal framework. Thus is how all change (to the bad and to the good the same) occurs in a peaceful way. It's interesting to note how many now-mainstream ideas were fringe 30 years ago, and outright scandalous 100-150 years ago: universal suffrage, social security, gay marriage, legal marijuana, etc.
- sli 6y ago
  I am happy to say that I do and would not give a single, solitary shit about a hive of racists and hatemongers losing their platform for spreading those things. Liberty is irrelevant to this, nobody is owed a platform owned by somebody else, not even 4chan, and until 4chan/8chan/8kun and the like are running their own datacenters, their platform is not fully theirs.
  - Hamuko 6y ago
    Where is 4chan hosted then?
  - yurielt 6y ago
    I commend you to visit the place and you will discover that you are mistaken. There is one ONE place where there is racism and is literally called a containment board is /pol/. Outside of that honestly it seems you have a personal problem with people that you dont know like I doubt the people of /origami/ are "hatemongers" but what do I know. And while people arent "owed" a platform. Given the actual and the factual characteristics of modern web infrastructure, what you are saying is " Yes I would like to spread my buttchecks such that Mr Zuckerberg, Mr Bezzos and five more guys control what can and cant be said.". I dont want to give a shit about that people either but not caring about this is what is going to entrench the power of ZUckerberg and cronies, and I dont want silicon valley assholes in charge (even more)
- trianglem 6y ago
  I’ve been on 4chan since before 2008, was the “mod” of a board and even met moot a few times irl. Fun and games for a very short time followed by immediately realizing how cancerous what was happening was. Using humor to poison minds, that place should burn in hell.
devmunchies 6y ago
hydra[1]. if you remove 4chan I guarantee you well get 3 in its place. [1]: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hydra-Greek-mythology https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hydra-Greek-mythology
- edgineer 6y ago
  There are already many smaller chans, with varied attending demographics. I think this is referred to as "the webring." 4chan would sure be a shame to see go, though.
- klodolph 6y ago
  Why do you say that? What do you mean by that? If you take an online community down, the people that made up that community will not all end up in the same place, they won’t bring the entire culture of that community with them, and some of them won’t make the jump. Maybe you end up with three new chans, but you end up with three smaller, more fractured chans. Organization and relationships will evaporate because people won’t have alternate ways of recognizing or reaching their friends, may not use the same handles, may not end up on the same sites, etc. Site administrators will get worn out and tired of dealing with it, and may run out of money to keep the site up. I’m not saying that you should take down 4chan, just saying that if 4chan did disappear, it would leave a big hole that would take a long time to fill again. That, and any new chans would have a hard time claiming to be THE chan. There are already like twenty active “chan” sites or more. Besides 2channel and 4chan, the other sites don’t have much credibility or “pull”.
  - devmunchies 6y ago
    I think 4chan is different. It has a unique user base with a lot of internet history. If you take it down it will create a new energy in the free speech movement that will gain incredible momentum. 4chan is definitely functioning as a containment site right now. It hasn't changed in years, so a replacement would likely be more innovative.
    - klodolph 6y ago
KLexpat 6y ago
4chan /g/ is basically an uncensored 2003 version of Hacker news. In fact, they often discuss the same topics. I saw the 'gnome DE' article posted there last week - after it was shared with HN it got 1k+ upvotes. The 'blue boards' are probably very similar to you in terms of worldview
- trianglem 6y ago
  Yes, nothing wrong with the “censored” version of hacker news here. There is clearly a lot of good or 4chan but it’s not worth it.
thinkingemote 6y ago
4chan is protected by LEO. It proactively reports illegal postings to LEO, shares logs proactively, responds quickly and is heavily moderated. Additionally most of the site isn't troublesome. The rules are US freedom of speech which is much more liberal than Europe and hate speech definitions so the content on the adult boards is shocking to me and some may be illegal in Europe, but it's not illegal in the US. There are worse sites but this one is the one that enters the less well informed public's consciousness ironically.
- trianglem 6y ago
  It’s definitely troublesome. Racist memes may not be illegal but they are hugely damaging to a multi ethnic society.

drak0n1c 6y ago

Ron Paul was locked out of his Facebook page today. https://twitter.com/ronpaul/status/1348694943905308672 https://twitter.com/ronpaul/status/1348694943905308672

DisjointedHunt 6y ago
This is absolutely ridiculous.
Hamuko 6y ago
I thought Ron Paul was just an old crank with a shitty son, and not some radical.