The burden of proof is on you to prove that a "mind" that is meaningfully different from a very powerful computer exists in the first place in order for anyone

The burden of proof is on you to prove that a "mind" that is meaningfully different from a very powerful computer exists in the first place in order for anyone to entertain the idea of whether not a computer can approximate it. At first blush the mind is just an emergent property of the powerful biological computer in your skull. If you think its animated by a spiritual component its on you to provide that that even exists.