Taibbi is 'fringe' because Substack? Is that really what you are saying? Rolling Stone is not The Economist but I have a hard time understanding the way you s

Taibbi is 'fringe' because Substack? Is that really what you are saying? Rolling Stone is not The Economist but I have a hard time understanding the way you seem to be trying to characterize Taibbi. Can you point to the specific 'wild things' and/or dishonesty in the Taibbi piece?