4 ms·
> In 2008, a similar unraveling began; its implications still remain unknown. When was this written? The post date indicates today, but are these people really
by eslaught 6y ago
> In 2008, a similar unraveling began; its implications still remain unknown.
When was this written? The post date indicates today, but are these people really working along such long time horizons that we can't work out the consequences of 2008 twelve years later?
- spurgu 6y agoThe article references: > Galbraith, who had just published “<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/jul/11/100-best-nonfiction-books-affluent-society-jk-galbraith https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/jul/11/100-best-nonfi..." target="_blank" rel="nofollow">The Affluent Society</a> Which would indicate recently (post-2016). Edit: I'm also seriously annoyed by articles that don't display the published date. Edit2: But I believe it references the quantitative easing, "printing money to boost the economy", which has been done ever since 2009, and which so far seems to have been working, but there's uncertainty as to whether it's sustainable or will lead to a collapse of the whole economy.
- trefn 6y agoThe article is an excerpt from the book here: https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/collision-course https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/collision-course which appears to have been published in 2014.