3 ms·
Armed protests against the election results are perfectly legal. Banning people who try to organize armed protests on social media is censorship. If these peo
by root_axis 6y ago
Armed protests against the election results are perfectly legal.
Banning people who try to organize armed protests on social media is censorship.
If these people get violent it's big tech's fault for banning them and the media for ridiculing them.
The president called for peace but they still blame him for the violence.
Why is the media critical of the Trump protests but approving of the BLM riots?
I'm expected to be civil in my response to all of the above.
- happytoexplain 6y ago>If these people get violent it's big tech's fault for banning them and the media for ridiculing them. This is immoral, and dismissive of personal responsibility. If these people protest, it is arguably the fault of big tech and the media. If these people get violent, it is their fault, unless big tech and the media are literally and personally committing physical violence against them (which is the key difference between this and the BLM riots).
- salawat 6y agoOh really? How bout all those riots, looting, and arson? Or are we just going to ignore that? How bout all of the normal people who lost their lives to racially motivated violence? The businesses destroyed? The people who didn't have insurance? Don't want to hear excuses for one side over the other. The fact is, things have gotten to the boil over point on both sides. No one is innocent in any of this, and nothing is accomplished except more damage to the Union. Enough is enough!
- alkonaut 6y agoYou can’t make this up. > Trump protests > BLM riots [picture from family guy with skin tone chart.jpg]
- root_axis 6y agoI'll note that this post is sarcasm for posterity's sake.