4 ms·
I'd say if they don't have the means to stand on their own and build all their own mitigations against this sort of attack, then they've bit off more than they
by heleninboodler 6y ago
I'd say if they don't have the means to stand on their own and build all their own mitigations against this sort of attack, then they've bit off more than they can chew.
If their goal is to be a free-speech-above-all platform that is definitely going to piss off both infrastructure providers and the world of people who might attack them, then they better have the technical capabilities to back that up or they're going to get torn to shreds. Nobody else is required to help them in their misguided (in my opinion) endeavor.
And yes, it's possible that such a grand plan takes more resources than they actually have. Not anyone else's problem.
- lolc 6y agoI totally agree. Their situation looks untenable. I'd love to know the risk-scenarios they considered. Could they imagine getting booted off AWS?