4 ms·

I've read the GA and PA lawsuits in full, and was on the conference call to hear the PA court arguments for the motion to dismiss. Your take on it is not even r

I've read the GA and PA lawsuits in full, and was on the conference call to hear the PA court arguments for the motion to dismiss. Your take on it is not even remotely accurate. There was plenty of evidence, but it's apparently a thought crime to say so. If there was nothing to hide there wouldn't be a need to censor it.

unethical_ban 6y ago
"Uh huh" "Nuh uh" "Uh huh" I too saw (clips of) several of these lawsuits, where Trump advocates were threatened with contempt and finally admitted a complete lack of evidence for claims of fraud. I also know that elections officials across the country, from both parties, assert there is no evidence of fraud in a systemic manner or in any manner that would change the results of the election. I also know that the GOP leader of the Senate, the GOP lap-dog Attorney General, and the US intelligence community are in agreement that there is no evidence of the fraud alleged. https://wannabewonk.com/wannabe-coup/ https://wannabewonk.com/wannabe-coup/ In short, the facts you linked to (ha) don't align with how the legal system works, common sense, or reality.
ahiknsr 6y ago
> There was plenty of evidence, but it's apparently a thought crime to say so. Can you please share some credible evidence?
- Nuzzerino 6y ago
  Only if your definition of "credible" doesn't coincide with the side you happen to agree with.
  - pbourke 6y ago
    So that’s a no?
    - Nuzzerino 6y ago
      https://hereistheevidence.com/ https://hereistheevidence.com/ Maybe some of this stuff is debunked but they try to catalog it here.
  - jonwithoutanh 6y ago
    so no?
toast0 6y ago
If the claim is the courts weren't willing to hear the evidence, then why not share this compelling evidence in the court of public opinion? All I've heard is claims that there is evidence, none of which has been shared. Or when it has been shared is not compelling.

unethical_ban 6y ago

"Uh huh" "Nuh uh" "Uh huh" I too saw (clips of) several of these lawsuits, where Trump advocates were threatened with contempt and finally admitted a complete lack of evidence for claims of fraud. I also know that elections officials across the country, from both parties, assert there is no evidence of fraud in a systemic manner or in any manner that would change the results of the election. I also know that the GOP leader of the Senate, the GOP lap-dog Attorney General, and the US intelligence community are in agreement that there is no evidence of the fraud alleged. https://wannabewonk.com/wannabe-coup/ https://wannabewonk.com/wannabe-coup/ In short, the facts you linked to (ha) don't align with how the legal system works, common sense, or reality.

ahiknsr 6y ago

> There was plenty of evidence, but it's apparently a thought crime to say so. Can you please share some credible evidence?

Nuzzerino 6y ago
Only if your definition of "credible" doesn't coincide with the side you happen to agree with.
- pbourke 6y ago
  So that’s a no?
  - Nuzzerino 6y ago
    https://hereistheevidence.com/ https://hereistheevidence.com/ Maybe some of this stuff is debunked but they try to catalog it here.
- jonwithoutanh 6y ago
  so no?

toast0 6y ago

If the claim is the courts weren't willing to hear the evidence, then why not share this compelling evidence in the court of public opinion? All I've heard is claims that there is evidence, none of which has been shared. Or when it has been shared is not compelling.