>In either case, best this be settled in courts and legislation, not corporate meeting rooms that are echo chambers of opinion. I'm really confused by what you

>In either case, best this be settled in courts and legislation, not corporate meeting rooms that are echo chambers of opinion. I'm really confused by what your points is. You spend most of your post talking about how laws against hate speech are ineffectual because courts can't determine a persons emotions and beliefs, and then say it's best handled by laws and courts.