3 ms·
> The answer must be yes This does not logically follow. It is entirely possible that going even further would require greater resources than even the superint
by WJW 6y ago
> The answer must be yes
This does not logically follow. It is entirely possible that going even further would require greater resources than even the superintelligence can bring to bear.
- TheOtherHobbes 6y agoFor human-recognisable values of "resources." I realise that all of these arguments come down to "AI of the gaps". But in true Dunning-Kruger style, we don't know what we don't know - not just about AGI, but intelligence of any kind, including our own.
- alisonkisk 6y agoThat's not what Dunning-Kruger means.
- dragonwriter 6y ago> But in true Dunning-Kruger style, we don't know what we don't know That's not D-K, but Rumsfeldian Uncertainty.
- xt00 6y agoDefinitely feels like a challenging philosophical question -- if you have a superintelligence how much more room is there above it in intelligence and what does that additional intelligence buy you?
- contravariant 6y agoThe challenges don't even start there. The real problem is how to even determine superintelligence. If it's just a system that can do stuff a human can't then we've long since passed it. If it's a system that can achieve stuff humans can't, through whatever means, then it's necessarily beyond human intelligence to build it, at least intentionally.