Ok, so that is a good example of protected speech that we might not like. I read through the thread and you did a good job explaining the perils of censoring vi

Ok, so that is a good example of protected speech that we might not like. I read through the thread and you did a good job explaining the perils of censoring viewpoints. The US has long done a “controlled burn” in banning violent speech, but we do need to be vigilant that it doesn’t turn into a wild fire. I don’t understand why they removed the tweet instead of labeling it if they really want to be in the fact checking business.