4 ms·
> Jones, however, told the Washington Examiner that she is not advocating for all children to be put on such medications. > "I was not making an argument that
by sudenmorsian 6y ago
> Jones, however, told the Washington Examiner that she is not advocating for all children to be put on such medications.
> "I was not making an argument that all youth should be given puberty blockers. This was not an actual proposal, and it is not something I advocate or endorse," Jones said.
> "This was an argument that claims of trans youth’s unreadiness to give consent to puberty blockers, if followed consistently, lead to the conclusion that all youth are likewise not ready for the experience of puberty itself. Because that conclusion is absurd — again, this was not something that I advocated or endorsed — the argument that trans youth can’t consent to puberty blockers is faulty," Jones added.
With all due respect, in this situation you’re claiming that a fringe view in the US (which even the alleged proponent says was not an actual proposal) is the accepted norm, and that anyone who objects is called a transphobe. That’s not the case at all.
- throwawaysea 6y agoMy main point is something different. I'm saying that things have gone so far that people express extreme suggestions like that one, and along with that extremism they are less receptive to any discussion or research challenging their narratives. For example, I've seen concerned parents and organizations push back on policies that let children secretly consent to puberty blockers without notice to parents. I've literally seen posts discussing this get deleted from Facebook or Instagram, due to activists mass reporting them. The practice of banning "wrongspeak" that doesn't align with favored groups/causes is very real and it is a big problem.