3 ms·
Launching on those legacy consoles then was a mistake. As a PC player, I had no issues playing on a 3 year-old machine, it's about as buggy as the average huge
by mancerayder 6y ago
Launching on those legacy consoles then was a mistake. As a PC player, I had no issues playing on a 3 year-old machine, it's about as buggy as the average huge RPG game (like Divinity OS, Skyrim, etc.). Then every week or two you get a patch.
Baldur's Gate 3 did better PR by releasing an early release version first, so the impatient can jump on it.
My personal feeling is there is so much effort put into this game, it's sad to see it spun as a dismal failure by a greedy entity. It must be demoralizing for the devs and artists and other staff members that worked on it.
- mdoms 6y ago> Then every week or two you get a patch. Correct me if I'm wrong but other than the day-1 patch hasn't there been only a single (quite minor) patch for this game so far?
- steinuil 6y agoAt least on PC, there have been a few minor patches that fixed some of the most pressing issues like broken quest lines or the save file becoming corrupted if it surpassed 8mb (which apparently could happen very easily if you played a lot on the same save). The last was released 19 days ago.
- mancerayder 6y agoI see hotfix 1.05 on Dec 21 and hotfix 1.06 on Dec 23, which is the most recent for me.
- daemin 6y agoWhich consoles would you have launched it on? You can't actually launch just for the PS4 Pro or the Xbox One X, you have to support all versions of the PS4 or the Xbox One. Also the game doesn't run natively on the current gen consoles but through an emulation layer for previous console games.