>If this speech threatens democracy, peace, and safety, why hasn't it been made illegal by the government, and how has the US managed to do so well for centurie

>If this speech threatens democracy, peace, and safety, why hasn't it been made illegal by the government, and how has the US managed to do so well for centuries with it being perfectly legal? Because we've generally dealt with that by deplatforming that sort of speech socially and/or in the private sector. The history of the civil rights movement is filled with boycotts and other sorts of social pressure campaigns.