3 ms·
You can also just run a docker container for it [0]. This has the added benefit of separating your data from the runtime so you can move it around as if you had
by imposterr 6y ago
You can also just run a docker container for it [0]. This has the added benefit of separating your data from the runtime so you can move it around as if you had a physical cloud key.
[0] https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/unifi-controller https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/unifi-controller
- centimeter 6y agoI shouldn't have to run a docker appliance for my network appliances to function. Are you kidding me?
- secabeen 6y agoYou don't. The docker appliance (or whatever platform you use to run the controller) only is needed for config changes. You can shut it down when finished making changes and everything runs fine. The install at my mom's house has the Windows controller, and I don't think it's run in 6 months.
- lsllc 6y agoYeah ... I find that the containerized UniFi controller tends to crash after a few days with various Java errors. I've tried several different unifi-controller containers, although I haven't tried this particular one so I'll give it a try.
- dawnerd 6y agoThat particular image has been problem free for me on unraid for I dunno feels like years now. They did do some update that I missed the notes on that wiped out my database and I had to re add everything. Wasn't too happy about that.
- lsllc 6y agoI have tried a couple of others before and have currently been using: https://github.com/goofball222/unifi https://github.com/goofball222/unifi But every couple of days, the logs start to fill up with random java exceptions, then it starts leaking memory and eventually brings the host to a grinding halt and crashes. I've had no troubles when using the Cloud Key Gen2 Plus, but I like the idea of the controller NOT being located on site.