3 ms·
I don't think marketing it as "fastest" without any benchmarks is the best idea, I'm betting benchmarks would not verify the claim given this is written in Ruby
by atom_arranger 6y ago
I don't think marketing it as "fastest" without any benchmarks is the best idea, I'm betting benchmarks would not verify the claim given this is written in Ruby.
"Easy to use" might be a better description.
- klysm 6y agoI would go as far as saying it's impossible that it's the 'fastest' if it's written in ruby, in pretty much any sense.
- SftwreEngnr 6y agoYeah yeah