> We have to distinguish between... No, we dont have to distinguish that. Your weak premise would justify the discrimination of atheists, anarchists, monarchis

> We have to distinguish between... No, we dont have to distinguish that. Your weak premise would justify the discrimination of atheists, anarchists, monarchists, pentecostals,marxists, epicureans... among thousands of other groups. I dont really understand why it is so complicated. At individual and private level I can decide who will I spend my time with, who I will invite to my place, go to the beach etc, with no coercion and I expect everybody else to have that right too. At public level I have the expectation to serve all the people the same (ceteris paribus) unless I am forced by current legislation to not do so (like selling alcohol to a minor). I would not extend that prohibition to a person who can request my services legally , if the person is going to pay and if he is going to behave like any other customer. If I manage a 7/11 I would not create an ideological purity test to figure out if I will sell you gas or a soda and I think society will be way better if everybody does that too.