> How are they an arbiter of truth? Because they ban politically inconvenient viewpoints. > their platform being associated with a company that has no problem

> How are they an arbiter of truth? Because they ban politically inconvenient viewpoints. > their platform being associated with a company that has no problem with users coordinating violent and deadly insurrections... Does Twitter not host the leaders of terroristic regimes? Has Reddit not been implicated in murder of innocents? Does Facebook not routinely have calls to violence? All major platforms have broken AWS TOS countless times, and much more often than Parler at that. It’s pretty clear that Parler is being singled out here, and that breaking the AWS TOS is a flimsy excuse at best.