3 ms·
Parler's complaint references here says that they did remove them and also that the article referenced was leaked before it was sent to Parler. We'll have to w
by Natsu 6y ago
Parler's complaint references here says that they did remove them and also that the article referenced was leaked before it was sent to Parler.
We'll have to watch this play out in court, later.
- tptacek 6y agoI don't know whether that's true or false but I also don't know why it matters. Absent a confidentiality clause AWS is free to publish whatever they want. Certainly, people routinely publish their private communications with AWS.
- Natsu 6y agoI may be misreading things, but it sounds to me like they published the list of things to remove and Parler removed them after notification, but they're using the publication to try to make it look like they were notified before they actually were. But this is a complaint, so I can't just assume that any of these things are actually true and that's why I want to reserve judgement until we hear how all the evidence plays out in court.