3 ms·
I don't see how 'disliking the process' equates to 'not benefitting from the outcome'. I dislike interviews, but I like having a job.
by tpoacher 6y ago
I don't see how 'disliking the process' equates to 'not benefitting from the outcome'.
I dislike interviews, but I like having a job.
- kurthr 6y agoWell, since many of these "experts" are professors with tenure they can't really lose their job nor readily increase their salary. They might be able to more easily get funding for their research/students from nontraditional sources (e.g. industry grants), but many of them would not, because they value the estimation of their peers which might be (rightfully) hurt. Not all or even a majority even care about money or they wouldn't have chosen the profession. Some of this has changed with startup board positions, industry coalition funding, and academic promotional departments, but not quickly. All of that goes out the door with pundits and shills, who don't just appear once, but have chosen the field for fame/fortune... and for those who have largely chosen to sell their research topics/results for profit. However, those are relatively easy to spot by most viewers and journalists who care.
- ska 6y agoThere isn't any direct benefit for many of the people I had in mind. Indirect benefits are harder to evaluate and will be nature involve a bunch of hand waving, but there is a huge difference between say holding a research chair, and having a consulting business as an "available expert".