This complaint seems to include a ton of things like: - AWS was especially mean to us - AWS is hypocritical, look how bad twitter is - We were singled out fo

This complaint seems to include a ton of things like: - AWS was especially mean to us - AWS is hypocritical, look how bad twitter is - We were singled out for political reasons - This will kill us All of which might be true, but none of which is illegal. The main (only?) real legal complaint here seems to amount to "AWS banned us to prop up Twitter in an anticompetitive way that's illegal under antitrust laws." That seems incredibly weak to anyone who's been following this story at all. The charitable interpretation of AWS's actions would be that they banned Parler for refusing to moderate effectively. The less charitable version is that AWS doesn't care about Parler, but caved to public and internal pressure to ban them. In no reasonable interpretation did AWS do it because they just love Twitter so much. I don't see this suit going anywhere.