3 ms·
I understand, but that doesn't really have to do with the point I'm trying to make. Even if you use "organizing an insurrection against the government" as your
by newfeatureok 6y ago
I understand, but that doesn't really have to do with the point I'm trying to make. Even if you use "organizing an insurrection against the government" as your baseline - is a single post on Facebook/Twitter enough to justify banning? Obviously not - the question is what metrics are acceptable given a certain level of capability by the forum/company.
Only so much moderation is possible given a certain amount of moderators and company resources. Are these rules inherently biased against smaller companies?
- spankalee 6y agoWhat "single" post are you talking about? Parler had thousands of offending posts and users and refused to moderate at all after being told to to be in compliance with various ToS. It's no surprise that Amazon, Apple, Google, Twilio, etc., do not want to be associated with or support violent seditionists.
- shiburizu 6y agoWhatever metric you need to hit to be linked to a group of people who rioted in the capitol building of a superpower state I presume.