4 ms·
I'd challenge the assertion you're making here -- again, it is reductive to reduce the entirety of the nationwide protests against police murders to a handful o
by generalk 6y ago
I'd challenge the assertion you're making here -- again, it is reductive to reduce the entirety of the nationwide protests against police murders to a handful of cherry-picked instances of violence. You're doing that and then dismissing the entire issue because of it, which is intellectually dishonest, which you already know.
You aren't giving the same treatment to the the other side here -- you're not saying "if keeping people safe means the police should be allowed to murder folks / bludgeoning a police officer to death when storming the capitol" so I find it difficult to believe you're merely concerned about the use of violence.
You did, several comments up, state "the assault on the capitol was an unprecedented attack on democracy," which it was, but that's after posting multiple links where you're posting links and evidence trying to discredit the nationwide BLM protests by painting them as violent, so again, your bias is evident.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- neartheplain 6y agotrying to discredit the nationwide BLM protests by painting them as violent I’m only trying to discredit the violence, as I made clear in my original comment. If you’ll casually assign me false motives and claim I’m “intellectually dishonest,” I see no reason to continue our discussion.