> The disgusting content was literally its reason for existing, despite all of the bland "we're just a free speech site" stuff. I disagree with this. My experi

> The disgusting content was literally its reason for existing, despite all of the bland "we're just a free speech site" stuff. I disagree with this. My experience with Parler was very limited, but from a quick glance, I was not able to find any call for violence. I'm sure it exists, but the sense I got is that the vast majority of content and accounts are simply posting conservative content. Do you have evidence that "disgusting content" (whatever that means) is its "reason for existing"? That seems like a self-serving editorial conclusion rather than something borne out by hard evidence.