3 ms·
Actually he was offered even less, 4 months. http://volokh.com/2013/01/16/the-criminal-charges-against-aaron-swartz-part-2-prosecutorial-discretion/ http://vol
by FDSGSG 6y ago
Actually he was offered even less, 4 months.
http://volokh.com/2013/01/16/the-criminal-charges-against-aaron-swartz-part-2-prosecutorial-discretion/ http://volokh.com/2013/01/16/the-criminal-charges-against-aa...
>The alternative sentence to consider is what Swartz would have received if he had agreed to plead guilty. According to Swartz’s lawyers, the prosecutors in the case offered two different pleas. First, they would agree to a sentence of four months if Swartz agreed to plead guilty to the felonies. And second, they could agree to a deal in which Swartz agreed to plead guilty, the government would argue for a 6 month sentence, and Swartz could argue for a lesser sentence (presumably including probation). In all likelihood, the judge would have then sentenced Swartz to 4 months under the 1st plea and whatever the judge thought appropriate, up to 6 months, under the second plea.
- jeltz 6y agoWhich makes it even worse. A 4 month plea deal on a 50 year maximum sentence is clear evidence of that something is vet wrong. It either means the deal or the max sentence is wrong.
- ryanlol 6y agoYou’re not wrong, but “50 year maximum sentence” is off by at least an order of magnitude.
- rwmurrayVT 6y agoThe judge is not bound by a plea agreement in federal court.