4 ms·
That is a mistake of getting a very ad-hoc contract and then doing something that creates a lot of risk of negative consequences (i.e. supporting the overthrow
by DickingAround 6y ago
That is a mistake of getting a very ad-hoc contract and then doing something that creates a lot of risk of negative consequences (i.e. supporting the overthrow of a democracy).
Honestly, this feels to me like just the best sort of stuff that private companies, and a world that relies on them does: Everyone likes but doesn't need those services. There's a lot of companies competing and the offering is great. If someone is such a pain in the butt that no one wants to do business with them, they have a hard time but still can if they want to go it alone and build it all themselves.
These are light "highlights how well it works" stories to me.
- jeffreyrogers 6y ago> i.e. supporting the overthrow of a democracy Do you have evidence that Parler was involved in the storming of the Capitol building? Glenn Greenwald says it was not involved. > Everyone likes but doesn't need those services Well the employees of the company sure need them if they want to pay their mortgages, buy food, etc.
- mech422 6y agoGiven 70TB of parler data was leaked, I'm sure people can find out one way or another if they are so inclined.