3 ms·
That was my point, really. No one says there can’t be some level of moderation or hierarchy built in. Decentralized != immutable != non-heirarchical. And like
by nwienert 6y ago
That was my point, really. No one says there can’t be some level of moderation or hierarchy built in.
Decentralized != immutable != non-heirarchical.
And like sibling, it need not be entirely anonymous either.
The feds would allow it if they had some level of legal access to manipulate it, which would in turn be what most people who want decentralized social networking seem to want: to at least have a somewhat democratically elected body governing it, not an arbitrary private company.