The part this argument is forgetting is what agency a person has over how people use the stuff they've made. The issue is that if Twitter can't qualify how peo

The part this argument is forgetting is what agency a person has over how people use the stuff they've made. The issue is that if Twitter can't qualify how people use their site, then they're losing agency over a resource they spend a lot of time and effort maintaining. They'd have to operate at a loss for the good of the people who use it. Should the US government run a public version of Twitter? Maybe the UN, even?