3 ms·
Yes, because WikiLeaks is very diligent in scrubbing sensitive private information from leaks.
by valvar 6y ago
Yes, because WikiLeaks is very diligent in scrubbing sensitive private information from leaks.
- BlueTemplar 6y agoThey aren't, or did they get much better at it in recent years?
- tootie 6y agoDidn't WikiLeaks publish the decryption key for the Manning leaks and all the unredacted messages got into the wild?
- dleslie 6y agoIIRC, that was the Guardian, who was provided the key in trust in order to help publish the data.
- 9387367 6y ago> Didn't WikiLeaks publish the decryption key for the Manning leaks and all the unredacted messages got into the wild? No. > WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange phoned the White House to warn lives would be put at risk by the publication of cables online, a court has heard. > On 25 August, 2011, German news outlet Der Freitag revealed that it was possible to access the unredacted database of cables by using a mirror site and a 58-key password that had been published in a book by The Guardian earlier in the year. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/wikileaks-julian-assange-white-house-hillary-clinton-chelsea-manning-a9359191.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/wikileaks-...
- mike00632 6y agohttps://wikileaks.org/Guardian-journalist-negligently.html https://wikileaks.org/Guardian-journalist-negligently.html No. Wikileaks did indeed accidentally give out the decryption key to the encrypted trove they published from the Manning leaks. There is probably still a torrent available of the full, unredacted scrape of Secret data from the SIPR network.