4 ms·
I think the video is too dismissive of the HP200LX. I still have one of these and it was a truly amazing thing to use. It was powered by a clockless 80C86 pro
by Wildgoose 6y ago
I think the video is too dismissive of the HP200LX. I still have one of these and it was a truly amazing thing to use.
It was powered by a clockless 80C86 processor and lasted for 40 hours on just 2 AA batteries.
Most of the in-built applications (e.g. Quicken and Lotus 1-2-3) ran directly from ROM rather than being copied into RAM and then executed. That meant when you pressed the button to switch to that program it was available instantly.
Quite frankly, compared to the HP 200LX our replacement handheld device (mobile phone) is actually a backward step.
- rootbear 6y agoI agree. I had the earlier HP 95LX and loved it. The 100LX and 200LX were definite improvements and I sometimes regret not having upgraded.
- zwieback 6y agoAgreed. I work on the site where it was developed and there are still many treasured hp handhelds in peoples drawers, still running today.