36 ms·
I'm clueless in this area. Would a raft be viable? Presumably it would add some drag if you're underway but a small inflatable pontoon raft seems like it coul
by jcims 6y ago
I'm clueless in this area. Would a raft be viable? Presumably it would add some drag if you're underway but a small inflatable pontoon raft seems like it could run 4-6 panels and be reasonably portable when not in use.
- walrus01 6y agoI do off grid PV professionally but don't know a lot about boats. But having been on a few 42-48 ft size cruiser type sailboats, I can't think of a place you could easily pack away six 1.65x1.0 meter size (typical 60-cell) rigid, aluminum framed high efficiency PV panels, unless you basically dedicated the smaller guest bunk to storage space.
- 2Gkashmiri 6y agoHey. You said you do off grid. I have a question. I own a 5 kW on grid setup for net metering. Works fine but now I want to use backups. I have two options, either lithium 100ah 48v which is expensive or 12v 200ah x 4 to make 48v. Cheaper but limited life because the home load would be on it entirely. I dont know. The calculation of kWh checks out to be 100ah x 48v = 4800wh. And for lead acid 200ah x 12v x 2= 4800wh. What do you suggest or is there something I am thinking incorrectly... space is not an issue BTW.
- walrus01 6y agogoogle "DIY powerwall" if you're up for a bit of a technical challenge. 4 x 12V 200Ah isn't big enough for most houses, unless it's like a cabin in the woods somewhere. and you're right that the cycle life of those and cost is high. but commercial li-ion based solutions are also expensive. However, if you can keep them at 80-85% state of charge, and rarely if ever discharge them below 30%, they should have lifespans 5-6x longer than the lead acid solution. in either solution you can't really consider the full volts * Ah capacity of the battery to be usable. If you were to ever use all of the watt-hours in a 12V 200Ah battery you'd kill it, you never want to go below 20% state of charge... so to be conservative the actual capacity of a single battery is something like: 12 * 200 = 2400 Wh, then (2400 * 0.70) = 1680Wh.
- guerby 6y agoCurrent LFP battery prices are around $120 per kWh delivered: I just ordered 14 kWh (48V 16S) for 1700 USD delivered. This is cheaper than an Apple laptop. A quarter of the price paid is shipping since it comes directly from China so source price is already under $100/kWh. A recent test by Will Prowse: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3U4ZfQ_IToI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3U4ZfQ_IToI $433 280Ah LiFePO4 Cells Tested: Cheaper than lead acid! Many people have the same good experience with these kind of cells: https://diysolarforum.com/ https://diysolarforum.com/ Added: 14 kWh will run a 20 Watt laptop for a month.
- driverdan 6y agoWhere are you getting new LFP batteries for that price?
- Peretus 6y agoThere is a fellow down in Port St. Lucie Florida that has launched a 100ah LiFePO4 with a 10-year warranty for ~ $550usd each. I saw his shop in person when I purchased some solar from him and was quite impressed with the work they've done and the research and testing that has gone into their products. I had already purchased my batteries by the time I discovered his product or I would have purchased from him: https://outlandsolar.com/ https://outlandsolar.com/ My partner and I live aboard a 41ft sailboat and both work remotely as programmers. I installed 1920w of solar on the boat and get approximately 3.5-4.5kwh per day in output, depending on which way we are oriented while at anchor. I installed 600ah of LiFePO4 batteries @ 12v and when combined with that amount of solar, we have pretty much all the power we need. We frequently cook with an air fryer and have a dishwasher on the boat that we run daily-- all off solar.
- mkingston 6y agoThe high efficiency panels are typically semi-flexible without the frame, are they not? Do you think it would be possible to obtain and mount them without a rigid frame? Or even to remove them from the frame? I'm asking partly because I had considered making some sort of basic, folding, portable solar panel structure- imagine a few semi-flexible panels duct-taped together. (I'd likely not _actually_ use duct tape).
- driverdan 6y agoThat's backwards. Flexible panels are less efficient than rigid ones.
- walrus01 6y agoCorrect, flexible cells are 10-14% efficient, the best rigid monocrystalline single junction Si cells are 23% plus.
- mkingston 6y agoI think that's correct for thin film panels. But it appears that monocrystalline panels can be manufactured with some flexibility. Hence my usage of the term "semi-flexible". Sunpower, for example, claims to produce high efficiency semi-flexible monocrystalline panels that would flex sufficiently for use on a bimini top, for example. It further appears that my statement "high efficiency panels are typically semi-flexible without the frame" is inaccurate- they are typically not reasonably described as semi-flexible, even without the frame and coating.
- walrus01 6y agoReal high efficiency monocrystalline si cells are not flexible in any way, for example the typical 156mm cell that makes up a 315-400W rated 60 or 72 cell panel. In fact they're quite brittle and fragile when not encapsulated on a backing sheet and under protective glass. Monocrystalline by definition is not flexible, you're referring to thin films (cadmium telluride or amorphous silicon or other)