4 ms·

If you can you will have the means? Lmao sounds like you believe popular support is an indicator of correctness and that is very very wrong you should read abou

If you can you will have the means? Lmao sounds like you believe popular support is an indicator of correctness and that is very very wrong you should read about Galileo pal

jusssi 6y ago
Lmao, pal to you too. Galileo succeeded, we heard his theory and eventually found it more correct than the previous one. And he managed that without Twitter, Youtube or Parler.
- yurielt 6y ago
  Yeah but the suffering that had to take place in order for that to happen was erroneous we should strive to avoid that and not licking Bezzos and ZUckerberg boots is part of a society where Galileos have to avoid trials
  - jusssi 6y ago
    So you go on about Lmao pals and licking boots. What it is that you actually propose? That someone who has a publishing platform, they're forced to propagate your message, no matter what it is? And if they refuse? Fines? Jailtime? Pitchforks, torches, white hoods, noose?
    - yurielt 6y ago
      >And if they refuse? Fines? Jailtime? Pitchforks, torches, white hoods, noose? SOrry what the fuck is wrong with you, no, idea why you try to thinly veil your dog whistling, are you trying to imply that not liking to bend over for silicon valley is a sign of liking the ku kux klan. Are you actually comparing or trying to make a cokmparison between lynching and not liking the coordinated power of a few companies? What is like wrong with you? I am latino no idea why you even suggest that, but we have legal means to stop powerful corporations from destroying political activists and smaller companies in a day. We should expand those protections to avoid seeing what we have seen. A coordinated attack on political activists and free speech alternatives. If that makes you think about nooses, then perhaps you should read things properly, and maybe get some help.

4 ms·

If you can you will have the means? Lmao sounds like you believe popular support is an indicator of correctness and that is very very wrong you should read abou

by yurielt 6y ago

If you can you will have the means? Lmao sounds like you believe popular support is an indicator of correctness and that is very very wrong you should read about Galileo pal

jusssi 6y ago
Lmao, pal to you too. Galileo succeeded, we heard his theory and eventually found it more correct than the previous one. And he managed that without Twitter, Youtube or Parler.
- yurielt 6y ago
  Yeah but the suffering that had to take place in order for that to happen was erroneous we should strive to avoid that and not licking Bezzos and ZUckerberg boots is part of a society where Galileos have to avoid trials
  - jusssi 6y ago
    So you go on about Lmao pals and licking boots. What it is that you actually propose? That someone who has a publishing platform, they're forced to propagate your message, no matter what it is? And if they refuse? Fines? Jailtime? Pitchforks, torches, white hoods, noose?
    - yurielt 6y ago
      >And if they refuse? Fines? Jailtime? Pitchforks, torches, white hoods, noose? SOrry what the fuck is wrong with you, no, idea why you try to thinly veil your dog whistling, are you trying to imply that not liking to bend over for silicon valley is a sign of liking the ku kux klan. Are you actually comparing or trying to make a cokmparison between lynching and not liking the coordinated power of a few companies? What is like wrong with you? I am latino no idea why you even suggest that, but we have legal means to stop powerful corporations from destroying political activists and smaller companies in a day. We should expand those protections to avoid seeing what we have seen. A coordinated attack on political activists and free speech alternatives. If that makes you think about nooses, then perhaps you should read things properly, and maybe get some help.