5 ms·
I've seen the term "permanently suspended" several times already. Not a native speaker, could someone please explain to me the difference between that and "bann
by bitcharmer 6y ago
I've seen the term "permanently suspended" several times already. Not a native speaker, could someone please explain to me the difference between that and "banned"?
- akhosravian 6y agoThey mean the same thing; it’s just a choice of words.
- remus 6y agoIn practice they effectively mean the same thing. I suspect they're going with "permanently suspended" now because they want to avoid people using phrases like they "banned free speech" or something similar to that.
- cbozeman 6y ago"permanently suspended free speech" doesn't really sound much different than "banned free speech". I can't really see this being a big deal, Bannon's got enough wealth to make his own website.
- KMag 6y agoAs a native speaker, it's probably a distinction without a difference. Both sound more harsh than regular suspension and both sound less harsh than permanently banned. Neither one tells you exactly what they've done in terms of the amount of effort required to re-instate him if they change their mind. Both signal that they're unlikely to change their minds any time soon. With a physical location, "banned" sometimes implies they've been declared a persona non grata, and the police will be called if they return. Clearly that doesn't apply to an online platform.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- egwor 6y agoI think it is for emphasis and for clarity. It is to clarify that the ban isn't temporary. A ban could be revoked or it could have a time limit. Permanent means it can't be reverted. I wonder if 'suspended' might also link to the wording within their ToS, so that's why they use ban vs suspended.
- Joeboy 6y agoTo me, "suspending" sounds like something you do to accounts, and "banning" sounds more like something you do to people. In practice they're often interchangeable.
- etiam 6y agoI agree. Also note that for something like a Youtube account there are records associated (e.g. media files, logs, followers) which "suspending" could imply the operator has not deleted, whereas "banning" seems more narrowly focused on taking away the communication privileges from user in question.
- chrischapman 6y agoThe best I can figure it is this: 'suspended' has a temporary sense, 'banned' has a permanent sense. While 'permanently banned' is a tautology, 'permanently suspended' is an oxymoron. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/suspended https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/suspended suspended = Caused to stop for a while; interrupted or delayed. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/banned https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/banned banned = Forbidden; not allowed. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/oxymoron https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/oxymoron oxymoron = A figure of speech in which two words or phrases with opposing meanings are used together intentionally for effect. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/tautology https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/tautology tautology = Redundant use of words
- etiam 6y agoOn the other hand 'banned for [duration]' and 'temporary ban' have definitely been in use for a long time, which I personally have never thought seems wrong. If those uses are in play, 'permanently banned' can actually be motivated for disambiguation. And I would suggest '[permanent] suspension' may have connotations of a statement about reversibility. 'We have the ability to reverse this action [but we intend not to exercise that ability, ever].'
- OJFord 6y agoAs a native speaker, I've seen it too, and it's just wrong. If you suspended someone and then said 'we're making your suspension permanent', it sounds like a 'cute'/think-you're-on-a-soap-opera way of saying 'you're now fired/expelled(/as applicable)'. Suspensions end. Even a suspension bridge for example is alluding to some temporal aspect, the natural outcome (gravity having its way) would be different.