While I do have an interpretation and thoughts on the specifics of said argument, I haven't actually stated any here so I'm not sure what you deemed to be the "

While I do have an interpretation and thoughts on the specifics of said argument, I haven't actually stated any here so I'm not sure what you deemed to be the "vulgar interpretation". I only claimed that it has been played out, which I used to mean it has entered a decent deal of public debate and progress on its application to current times seems to have stalled. Personally I think the nuances here still very much need to be ironed out, as your presumptive comment on my potential stance illustrates it hasn't been on the cultural level yet. I just don't think public debate is likely to get there before some bigger event happens that makes the application no longer relevant, though I could very much be wrong there.