3 ms·
Thing is you can dress it up with ideas of vulnerable moments and apparatus and operations and a uniquely challenging time and all this. But this isn't about Tr
by canoebuilder 6y ago
Thing is you can dress it up with ideas of vulnerable moments and apparatus and operations and a uniquely challenging time and all this. But this isn't about Trump, this isn't about now, this is about precedents. If something new and extreme is being done, almost always some extenuating factor will be found to try to justify it.
Trump is an unfortunate edge case and has set bad precedents that can hopefully be wisely washed away in time.
We need clearer and consistent norms in the digital space that are seen to embody the fundamental civic aspects of the nation from which this digital space arose. Such as equal access to certain things, the "dumb-pipes" model for the certain baseline trappings of modern society. Whether or not that means stripe here, I'm talking about the broader moment.
We don't want an escalating tit for tat of one bad thing leading to another. If the violence this summer had been dealt with more soundly, voices of leadership tamping it down instead of egging it on, it seems a good bet the recent activity at the capitol would have been more tame.
Similarly, we don't want to respond to a grasping, ineffectual, quasi-autocrat in the executive branch, with more effective autocratic tendencies in the techno-social sphere.
- pm90 6y agoPrecedents set by private companies mean absolutely nothing. Precedents set by a court of law have legal bearing, but they may also be challenged or changed (as long as they’re not judged to be unconstitutional, at least in the US). Worrying about precedent setting by private corporations is like premature optimization: there are bigger problems to focus on.