3 ms·
People aren't being banned for saying the election was stolen. People are being banned for saying the election was stolen without any credible evidence to suppo
by volkl48 6y ago
People aren't being banned for saying the election was stolen. People are being banned for saying the election was stolen without any credible evidence to support the claim. There is a very important difference there.
And if there was any evidence, it would been have presented in one of the ~60 lawsuits that universally got shot down by every single court, appeals court, and the Supreme Court. Because they had no evidence.
- zozbot234 6y agoI might wholly agree with you, but the real question is what happens next time. Perhaps the next claims of a stolen election will also be dismissed by the media and courts as "not credible", censored as "malicious lies" and dangerous "misinformation". How can y'all be so sure that you, or the public at large, will be enabled to tell the difference, when any and all debate about the claim of a stolen election will have been banned at the outset by an overt policy aimed at protecting "the public faith in our democracy"?
- MrMan 6y agoWe need federally run elections or at least strong enforcement of federal election laws. Every voter that is required to present ID at the polls should be provided an ID or be provided a mail-in ballot. Every citizen should be required by federal law to vote. And some other stuff I am not qualified to post about regarding secure voting systems.