3 ms·
>Should Fox News have their licenses removed, and be taken off the air & internet? Sounds like a good start. They have been involved in laundering terrorist rh
by wtfiswiththis 6y ago
>Should Fox News have their licenses removed, and be taken off the air & internet?
Sounds like a good start. They have been involved in laundering terrorist rhetoric and incitement to mass attacks. Take the case of Fox employing Tucker Carlson.
Tucker owns Daily Caller.
Daily Caller published an article extolling the virtues of ISIS-style ramming attacks against protestors.
Fox News republished this article. The result was a spike in ramming attacks against protestors.
Fox gracefully pulled the article after complaints, no blow back since it wasn't their own article anyways. Nothing to see here, just entities paying each other and relaying each other's incitement.
There has to be at least a dozen people at Fox News that need to be imprisoned for their role in pursuing death and violence against political and cultural opponents. So yes lets do the steps you mentioned then move on to discovery so we can find out how execs at Fox measured success when publishing incitement.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- abnkl 6y agoTucker Carlson has also interviewed Glenn Greenwald and called for the pardon of Assange. Something you would have expected from the "liberal" media pre 2010.
- ourmandave 6y agoTucker Carlson was ruled to be not a credible news source in a court of law when he was sued for slander. US District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil agreed with Fox's premise, adding that the network "persuasively argues" that "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statements he makes." https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9 https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case... It's the "any reasonable viewer arrives with an appropriate amount of skepticism" part that seems to be the problem.