4 ms·
>When the trifecta becomes republican, will liberal podcasts be banned? If they incite violence perhaps they will >I believe flagging and moderation and prosc
by gameswithgo 6y ago
>When the trifecta becomes republican, will liberal podcasts be banned?
If they incite violence perhaps they will
>I believe flagging and moderation and proscribing individual videos is better than banning channels outright and deplatforming.
That may indeed be a better course of action, though when you have habitual offenders, in this case bannons channel got 4 warnings, its a huge burden on you to keep checking each and every video, and the violence gets incited while you spend time checking.
- sn41 6y agoFair enough. I did not know that there were earlier warnings. A three-strike rule sounds fine.
- casefields 6y agoIf they've been convicted in a court of law for incitement, then many of us wouldn't have much of a problem.
- Artistry121 6y agoNo company or individual should have to carry rhetoric inciting violence until a court of law engages. Responsibility is not solely on the courts - corporations and people can make decisions on what is right without courts. Especially when the person is obviously saying it -“behead Fauci”. Bannon has a way to get his message out - he has his own media organization. Many people don’t feel like what Bannon is doing is right and don’t need a court of law to tell them. Courts of law defended slavery - people made decisions prior to the courts interference to change that. Small government requires the ability of private groups to choose their own moral stances.